Mainly featuring previews of eBooks of a philosophical tendency by indie author John O'Loughlin.
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
B.O.R.T.
Monday, 4 January 2016
The Virtuous Circles Quartet
Monday, 28 December 2015
The Ethnic Universality Quartet
Friday, 18 December 2015
The Maximum Omega Quartet
Friday, 27 November 2015
The Maximum Truth Quartet
Monday, 5 October 2015
Lopsided Conversations - Collected Dialogues Vol.1
Thursday, 6 August 2015
Dawn of the Life
Tuesday, 28 July 2015
In the Shadow of Spengler
a substantial collection of philosophical dialogues and essays having some relationship to Spengler and his 'philosophy of history'.
Monday, 13 July 2015
The Black Notebooks
Wednesday, 8 July 2015
Supercrossed
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Stations of the Supercross
Thursday, 25 June 2015
Atoms and Pseudo-Atoms in Subatomic Perspective
Saturday, 20 June 2015
Tuesday, 16 June 2015
Christmas in the Doghouse
Monday, 8 June 2015
Thursday, 4 June 2015
Reluctance
Wednesday, 27 May 2015
Limitless
Thursday, 21 May 2015
Philosophic Flights of Poetic Fancy
Friday, 15 May 2015
Ahead in the Clouds
Friday, 8 April 2011
LITERARY PARADOXES
Just as fiction is sublimated drama, or theatre, the ‘drama’ of the within, the psyche, so philosophy tends to be sublimated peotry, the ‘poetry’ of the within, the psyche, of sensibility. That partly explains why there is a lot of confusion between drama and fiction on the one hand, and between poetry and philosophy on the other, usually in terms of those disposed to drama giving themselves fictional airs and those disposed, by contrast, to poetry giving themselves philosophic airs, irrespective of the fact that both dramatists and poets kowtow, from opposite gender standpoints, to free soma from a bound psychic standpoint, a standpoint at variance with the psychic freedoms, again from contrary gender standpoints, of fiction and philosophy.
Put in elemental terms, the dramatist corresponds to either metachemistry (acting) or chemistry (speaking), outsanity of either a noumenal or a phenomenal, an absolute or a relative, kind, whereas the poet’s correspondence is to either pseudo-metaphysics (rhymed stanzas) or pseudo-physics (free verse), pseudo-insanity of either a noumenal or a phenomenal, an absolute or a relative, kind.
All of this contrasts with the correspondence of the philosopher to either metaphysics (aphorisms) or physics (essays), insanity of either a noumenal or a phenomenal, an absolute or a relative, kind, and with the correspondence of the fiction-writer to either pseudo-metachemistry (short stories) or pseudo-chemistry (novels), pseudo-outsanity of either a noumenal or a phenomenal, an absolute or a relative kind.
In axial terms, the phenomenal fiction-writer (novelist) is no less polar to the noumenal dramatist (actor), as pseudo-chemistry to metachemistry, than the phenomenal philosopher or, rather, pseudo-philosopher (essayist) to the noumenal poet or, rather, pseudo-poet (rhymed stanzas), as physics to pseudo-metaphysics on what is the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis stretching from northwest to southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.
Likewise, the phenomenal poet (free verse) is no less axially polar to the noumenal philosopher (aphorist), as pseudo-physics to metaphysics, than the phenomenal dramatist or, rather, pseudo-dramatist (spoken) to the noumenal fiction-writer or, rather, pseudo-fiction writer (short prose), as chemistry to pseudo-metachemistry on what is the church-hegemonic axis stretching from southwest to northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.
For, when axial relativity is taken into account, the male side, viz. poetry and philosophy, is always more genuine on the church-hegemonic axis than its female counterpart (in drama and fiction, both of which, as noted above, are pseudo), whereas the female side, viz. drama and fiction, is always more genuine on the state-hegemonic axis than its male counterpart (in poetry and philosophy, both of which, as noted above, are pseudo). That tells you a lot about the axial distinctions between the Irish and the British, even if such distinctions are rarely clear-cut.